Is it true that Canon DSLR camera is only suitable for portrait photography?
There is a fun process in this activity such as lighting, shooting angles, lens options, and of course the cameras you will use to create beautiful scenes, but also sharp, meaningful photos. Have you found a suitable camera? Perhaps you are still confused to choose Canon VS Nikon or other brands.
According to kenrockwell.com Which is best depends on what's important to you, and will vary as the years roll on. Today, Canon leads in full-frame and the high end APS-C cameras. The two are pretty similar in the middle and low end of the APS-C world.
There is a simple advice from kenrockwell.com about the dizziness of photographers to decide on Canon or Nikon. Today, Canon leads in full-frame and the high end APS-C cameras. The two are pretty similar in the middle and low end of the APS-C world. Kenrockwell.com also mentioned that when DSLRs became practical, Nikon was again the leader with the world's first practical DSLR, the Nikon D1 of 1999. Canon played catch up for quite a few years, and even as recently as 2008 Canon's top consumer DSLR, the Canon 5D, was well behind Nikon's top new D700.
After the era of the 2000s, the situation may be different because DSLR camera technology is growing very fast, so there is little paradigm change. Beginner photographers are beginning to be more pragmatic. They began to seriously consider choosing another brand, not always Nikon or Canon. Sony, Olympus, Pentax even Panasonic and Samsung have been teasing novice photographers to choose one of these brands.
Nevertheless, the myth of the greatness of Nikon for landscape photography still exist today. They consider, and perhaps because based on personal experience - Nikon is most appropriate for making photographs of scenery and wildlife photography. Meanwhile Canon's most powerful camera for indoor photography such as fashion show shoots, weddings, studio photos to photograph the beautiful models and other indoor photography activities.
Well, I would like to add an interesting quote from quora.com which deals about landscape photography, if comparing between Canon VS. Nikon. These are some of the opinions on the webiste: There may be some anecdotal evidence that Nikon's consumer-grade lenses are slightly better (sharper, better color) than Canon's consumer-grade lenses, but they're also (generally) more expensive, so it would be surprising if they weren't a little better. Canon's professional cameras have higher pixel dimensions in the top end than Nikon's, but Nikon has (arguably) a better auto focus system than Canon. Landscape photography benefits from high pixel-counts for flexibility in cropping, and high levels of image detail. But the reality is, both brands do each of these suitably well that the minor differences between them descend into insignificance.
Well, rather than getting caught up in the myths and facts about Canon VS Nikon, we might be better off visiting a camera store that has an officer who can be a bit "neutral" so they can offer non-binding advice about the right camera for landscape photography . Perhaps you will get surprising enlightenment, for example there are other brands that are also very suitable for landscape photography.
Most importantly, you can get a camera that also suits your budget so you can invest in buying additional lenses for both landscape photography and other types of photography, so you will discover your unique authenticity as a true photographer in the future, without Should be confused with the intense competition between Canon VS. Nikon.
Canon VS Nikon and others
Holidays Around the World